An incidental clot: a decision the evidence cannot make
Educational use only. Not clinically reviewed71-year-old man for calm finding recording, certainty and trade-off review, escalation to the treating service, and handoff practice. About 9 simulated minutes.
What you will practise
- Record the finding together with how it was found.
- Recognize a conditional recommendation on very low certainty as an instruction to decide with the patient.
- Record the benefit and the harm as figures, together.
- Record this patient’s own bleeding risk rather than a general one.
- Return the decision to the service that owns it.
- Record the decision as one to be made with the patient.
- Review the boundaries and their certainty.
- Hand off a decision that is still open.
Review and sources
Not clinically reviewed. No clinician has signed this scenario.
- Lyman GH, Carrier M, Ay C, et al. American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer. Blood Adv. 2021;5(4):927-974. Recommendation 26: for patients with cancer and incidental (unsuspected) pulmonary embolism, the panel suggests short-term anticoagulation treatment rather than observation (conditional recommendation, very low certainty in the evidence of effects). No systematic review or randomised trial addressed the question; certainty judged very low for risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision; named a research priority. Mortality RR 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.98), 89 fewer per 1000; symptomatic PE RR 0.36 (0.18-0.72), 77 fewer per 1000; major bleeding RR 3.00 (1.21-7.47), 128 more per 1000. Good practice statement 1: consideration of treatment should rest on the individual risk of thrombosis and major bleeding after full discussion of the potential benefits and harms.
- van der Hulle T, den Exter PL, Planquette B, et al. Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major hemorrhage in cancer-associated incidental pulmonary embolism among treated and untreated patients: a pooled analysis of 926 patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(1):105-113. Incidental pulmonary embolism is defined as pulmonary embolism diagnosed on computed tomography not performed for suspected pulmonary embolism, estimated to occur in 3.1% of all cancer patients. Weighted pooled six-month risks across 11 cohorts: recurrent VTE 5.8%, major haemorrhage 4.7%, mortality 37%. Recurrence 12% in untreated patients. Recurrence risk after subsegmental incidental embolism comparable to more proximal (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.50-2.4).
- Peris M, Jiménez D, Maestre A, et al. Outcome during and after anticoagulant therapy in cancer patients with incidentally found pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J. 2016;48(5):1360-1368. In 715 RIETE registry patients, during anticoagulation the rate of major bleeding exceeded the rate of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (10.1 versus 3.17 per 100 patient-years) and fatal bleeding exceeded fatal pulmonary embolism; the authors conclude the risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulant therapy in these patients is uncertain and must be evaluated in further studies.
Open Sim Lab is an educational simulator, not for clinical use. It is not a clinical decision-support tool, not a dosing calculator, and is not validated for any decision affecting a real patient.